2005-2006
School Site Plan
For
C. K. McClatchy
School Plan 2005-2006
Checklist for NCLB Compliance/Plan Completion
Check P those that apply: ¨ Schoolwide Title 1 ¨ Targeted Assistance Title I ¨ Program Improvement: Year___
| Does the Plan include… | Page #(s) | |||
|
|
Comprehensive Schoolwide Needs Assessment that…
|
|
||
|
|
Goal
Statements that…
|
|||
|
|
Action Plan/School Reform Strategies that...
|
|||
|
|
Data Summary
Pages
|
|
||
|
|
Addendum Pages
|
|
||
Just For The Kids
Best Practice Framework
| MAJOR THEMES | DISTRICT | SCHOOL | CLASSROOM | Local Influences, Relationships, Communication | |||
| What
is Taught and Learned
CURRICULUM AND ACADEMIC GOALS |
Define and Unpack Specific Academic Objectives by Grade and Subject | Focus School Plan on Explicit Improvement of Performance on Academic Objectives | Ensure Teaching Content is based on Specified Academic Objectives | Resource Allocation | |||
| Organizational Knowledge | |||||||
| Core Beliefs about Teaching and Learning | |||||||
|
Selecting/Developing People
STAFF SELECTIONS AND CAPACITY BUILDING |
Provide Strong Instructional Leaders, HQ Teachers, and Aligned PD | Select, Develop, And Allocate Staff Based on Student Learning | Collaborate in Grade/Subject Level Teams Focused on Student Work | ||||
| The Right
“Stuff”-Time and Tools
INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS, PRACTICES AND ARRANGEMENTS |
Provide Scientifically Based, Evidence-Based Instructional Programs | Ensure the Use of Scientifically Based, Evidence-Based Programs, Practices and Arrangements in Every Classroom | Use Scientifically Base, Evidence-Based Programs, Practices, and Arrangements | ||||
| Knowing the
Numbers
COMPILATION, ANALYSIS, AND USE OF DATA |
Develop Student Assessment and Data Monitoring Systems: Monitor School Performance | Monitor Teacher Performance and Student Learning | Monitor Student Learning | ||||
| Assuring ALL
Children Learn
RECOGNITION, INTERVENTION, AND ADJUSTMENT |
Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on School Performance | Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on Teacher and Student Performance | Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on Student Performance |
|
Focus Area: English Language Arts
Reading, Writing and English Language Development School Wide Needs Assessment |
|||
| Finding (Evidence) | Data Source | Possible Reason for Finding | Need Based on Finding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and 62.7% of Hispanic students were deemed not proficient in 2004 AYP ELA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is a need to implement an ELA remediation program to assist students in passing the CAHSEE | ||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Focus Area: English Language Arts
Reading, Writing and English Language Development Academic and Curriculum Goals |
|
| Academic Goals | |
|
Schoolwide Achievement Goals
(Reading, Writing, ELD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing the Achievement Gap Goals
(Subgroups) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Curriculum Goals | |
| Implementation Goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focus Area: Mathematics
School Wide Needs Assessment |
|||
| Finding (Evidence) | Data Source | Possible Reason for Finding | Need Based on Finding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Students 75% Asian 66% White 61% Hispanic 84% African Amer. 79% English Learner 80% |
|
|
|
All Students 37% African Amer. 36% Asian 42% White 27% Hispanic 44% English Learner 66% |
|
|
|
All Students 30% Asian 25% White 28% Hispanic 25% African Amer. 69% English Learner 45% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade
Level
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Focus Area: Mathematics
Academic and Curriculum Goals |
|
| Academic Goals | |
| Schoolwide Achievement Goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing the Achievement Gap Goals
(Subgroups) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Curriculum Goals | |
| Implementation Goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focus Area: School Climate
Parent Engagement, Family Support and Learning Environment School Wide Needs Assessment |
|||
| Finding (Evidence) | Data Source | Possible Reason for Finding | Need Based on Finding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focus Area: School Climate
Parent Engagement, Family Support and Learning Environment Goals |
|
| Goals | |
| Schoolwide Goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing the Achievement Gap Goals
(Subgroups) |
|
|
|
|
|
Focus Area: School Climate
Interventions |
|||
| Finding (Evidence) | Data Source | Possible Reason for Finding | Need Based on Finding |
| Mental Health YTD 156 students have received 12,560 minutes of counseling with School Counseling and Social Work Interns through Healthy Start |
|
|
|
| YTD 75 students have been referred through County Access for long-term intensive mental health services through CKM on-site community partner Catholic Healthcare West (CHW). |
|
|
|
| YTD 30 students have received intensive mental health services through CHW, |
|
|
|
| YTD 142 students have received mental health related intervention services from School Nurse (i.e. date rape, self-harm, homelessness |
|
|
|
| YTD 9 students have been referred for inpatient mental health services |
|
|
|
| Focus Area: School Climate Interventions School Wide Needs Assessment |
|||||||
|
Finding
(Evidence) |
Data Source | Possible Reason for Finding | Need Based on Finding | ||||
| Academic Support
(Health related)
YTD 575 students rec’d Hearing Screenings, 34 students referred for add’l follow up. 11 of the 34 seen by physicians, 2 with resulting surgery. |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Focus Area: School Climate
Interventions School Wide Needs Assessment |
|||
| Finding (Evidence) | Data Source | Possible Reason for Finding | Need Based on Finding |
Academic Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focus Area: School Climate
Interventions |
|
| Goals | |
| Schoolwide Goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing the Achievement Gap Goals
(Subgroups) |
|
|
Focus Area: School Climate
Attendance School Wide Needs Assessment |
||||
| Finding (Evidence) | Data Source | Possible Reason for Finding | Need Based on Finding | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| Total students who
received 3rd letter =557 (24.7% of 2257)
Total African American who received 3rd letter =45 (18.4% of 245} Total Hispanic who received 3rd letter =253 (40.1% of 630} |
SASI |
|
|
|
Focus Area: ClimateAttendanceGoals |
|
| Academic Goals | |
| Schoolwide Attendance Goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing the Achievement Gap Goals
(Subgroups) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Focus Area: School Climate
Discipline |
|
| Goals | |
| Schoolwide Goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
School Action Plan
Instructional Programs, Practices & Arrangements The Right “Stuff”—Time and Tools |
|||
| English Language Arts | |||
| Focus Area | Actions to Support Goals | Timeline | Evidence of Success |
| Schoolwide
Actions |
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
| Closing the
Achievement Gap Actions
(Subgroups) |
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
| School
Action Plan
Instructional Programs, Practices & Arrangements The Right “Stuff”—Time and Tools |
|||
| Mathematics | |||
| Focus Area | Actions to Support Goals | Timeline | Evidence of Success |
| Schoolwide Actions |
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
Sept, Oct |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
| Closing the Achievement Gap Actions (Subgroups) |
|
Oct - Nov |
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June Ongoing |
|
|
|
School Action Plan
Recognition, Intervention & Adjustments Assuring All Children Can Learn |
|||
| Focus Area | Actions to Support Goals | Timeline | Evidence of Success |
| Refining, and Adjusting First Teaching |
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept, Oct |
|
|
| Interventions |
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept - June |
|
|
|
Sept - June |
|
|
| Recognition |
|
Sept – June
Ongoing |
|
|
Fall/Spring |
|
|
|
School Action Plan
Monitoring, Compilation, Analysis, and Use of Data Knowing the Numbers |
|||
| Focus Area | Actions to Support Goals | Timeline | Evidence of Success |
| Use of Data to Inform Teaching & Learning |
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
| Monitoring Teaching |
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
| School
Action Plan
Leadership and Capacity Building Developing People |
|||
| Focus Area | Actions to Support Goals | Timeline | Evidence of Success |
| Professional Development |
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
Summer 05 |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
| Teacher
Articulation/
Collaboration |
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
| Strategies to Recruit & Retain Highly Qualified Teachers |
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
|
School Action Plan
School Climate Parent Engagement, Family Support, Learning Environment, Interventions, Attendance, and Discipline |
|||
| Focus Area | Actions to Support Goals | Timeline | Evidence of Success |
| Parent Engagement |
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
| Learning Environment |
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
| Student Engagement |
|
Sept – Oct Ongoing |
|
| Interventions |
|
9/05 and on-going |
|
|
9/05 and on-going |
|
|
|
9/05 |
|
|
|
10/05 |
|
|
|
12/05 |
|
|
|
12/05 |
|
|
|
03/06 |
|
|
|
02/06 |
|
|
|
10/05 |
|
|
|
10/05 |
|
|
|
10/05 |
|
|
|
04/06 |
|
|
|
02/06 |
|
|
|
10/05 |
|
|
| Attendance |
|
9/05 – 6/06 |
|
|
9/05 – 6/06 |
|
|
|
9/05 – 6/06 |
|
|
|
9/05 – 6/06 |
|
|
|
Sept-June |
|
|
|
Sept-June |
|
|
|
9/05 - 6/06 |
|
|
|
9/05 - 6/06 |
|
|
| Discipline |
|
Sept 2005 |
|
|
Sept 2005 |
|
|
|
Oct2005 |
|
|
|
9/05 – 3/06 |
|
|
|
9/05 – 3/06 |
|
|
Progress Toward Federal Accountability Levels
Adequate Yearly
Progress (AYP)
Comparison of District to School, Schoolwide and Subgroups, 2003 to 2004
| Language Arts | # Tested
2004 |
# Proficient 2004 | % Proficient 2004 | # Tested
2003 |
# Proficient 2003 | % Proficient 2003 | |
| District/All Students | 32,167 | 9,974 | 33 | ||||
| African American | 6,963 | 1,379 | 21.9 | ||||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 470 | 128 | 28.8 | ||||
| Asian | 6,968 | 2,565 | 37.8 | ||||
| Hispanic or Latino | 9,634 | 2,069 | 22.9 | ||||
| White (not of Hispanic origin) | 7,163 | 3,503 | 51.4 | ||||
| Socioecinomically Disadvantaged | 23,201 | 5,197 | 27.7 | ||||
| English Learner | 11,760 | 2,296 | 20.4 | ||||
| Students with Disabilities | 4, 004 | 401 | 10.4 | ||||
| School /All Students | 604 | 313 | 53.6 | 591 | 291 | 51.8 | |
| African American | 74 | 21 | 31.8 | 70 | 23 | 35.4 | |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 7 | N/A | 0 | 15 | 6 | 42.9 | |
| Asian | 167 | 88 | 53.6 | 164 | 84 | 52.5 | |
| Hispanic or Latino | 187 | 68 | 37.3 | 150 | 38 | 27.1 | |
| White (not of Hispanic origin) | 157 | 124 | 81 | 183 | 134 | 76.6 | |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 318 | 101 | 32.5 | 254 | 58 | 24.4 | |
| English Learner | 191 | 49 | 26.6 | 184 | 62 | 34.1 | |
| Students with Disabilities | 49 | 3 | 6.5 | 46 | 3 | 7.0 | |
Adequate Yearly
Progress (AYP)
| Mathematics | # Tested
2004 |
# Proficient 2004 | % Proficient 2004 | # Tested
2003 |
# Proficient 2003 | % Proficient 2003 | |
| District /All Students | 32,088 | 11,532 | 38.2 | ||||
| African American | 6,935 | 1,366 | 21.8 | ||||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 471 | 146 | 32.8 | ||||
| Asian | 6,957 | 3,511 | 51.8 | ||||
| Hispanic or Latino | 9,606 | 2,539 | 28.2 | ||||
| White (not of Hispanic origin) | 7,154 | 3,610 | 53 | ||||
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 23,151 | 6,714 | 30.6 | ||||
| English Learner | 11,732 | 3,757 | 33.6 | ||||
| Students with Disabilities | 3,975 | 514 | 13.4 | ||||
| School /All Students | 603 | 305 | 52.4 | 621 | 263 | 44.7 | |
| African American | 73 | 17 | 26.1 | 78 | 16 | 22.2 | |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 7 | N/A | 0 | 15 | 5 | 35.7 | |
| Asian | 165 | 107 | 66 | 168 | 80 | 48.8 | |
| Hispanic or Latino | 188 | 66 | 36.2 | 162 | 36 | 23.7 | |
| White (not of Hispanic origin) | 157 | 104 | 67.9 | 189 | 121 | 67.6 | |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 319 | 116 | 37.4 | 269 | 59 | 23.5 | |
| English Learner | 190 | 71 | 38.7 | 192 | 63 | 33.3 | |
| Students with Disabilities | 50 | 1 | 2.1 | 47 | 2 | 4.7 | |
Progress Toward State Accountability Levels
Academic Performance
Index (API)
Comparison of District to School, Schoolwide and Subgroups, 2003 to 2004
| # Included
in API 2004 |
2004
API |
2003
API |
Growth | |
| Districtwide | 35,771 | 682 | 666 | 16 |
| African-American | 7,346 | 602 | 587 | 15 |
| Asian | 8,315 | 734 | 712 | 22 |
| Hispanic-Latino | 10,431 | 633 | 618 | 15 |
| White | 8,079 | 765 | 759 | 6 |
|
Socioeconomically-
Disadvantaged |
25,030 | 642 | 625 | 17 |
Academic Performance Index (API)
| # Included
in API 2004 |
2004
API |
2003
API |
Target | Growth | |
| Schoolwide | 1,677 | 698 | 680 | 6 | 18 |
| African-American | 207 | 592 | 555 | 5 | 37 |
| Asian | 463 | 719 | 699 | 5 | 20 |
| Hispanic-Latino | 480 | 600 | 562 | 5 | 38 |
| White | 471 | 821 | 806 | A* | 15 |
|
Socioeconomically-
Disadvantaged |
837 | 594 | 567 | 5 | 37 |
A* At or Above 800
California Standards Test 2004
Language Arts
Percent and Number of Students (#) at Each Performance Level
Comparison of All Students to Subgroups
| All Students | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Enrolled | 655 | 589 | 529 | 1,726 | |||||
| Number Tested | 624 | 570 | 512 | 1,706 | |||||
| Advanced | 20 % | 124 | 21 % | 120 | 17 % | 87 | |||
| Proficient | 21 % | 131 | 20 % | 114 | 25% | 128 | |||
| Basic | 23 % | 143 | 24 % | 137 | 30 % | 153 | |||
| Below Basic | 21 % | 131 | 19 % | 108 | 14 % | 71 | |||
| Far Below Basic | 15 % | 94 | 16 % | 91 | 15 % | 76 | |||
| African American | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 95 | 67 | 52 | 216 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 20 % | 19 | 18 % | 12 | 27 % | 14 | 20 % | 45 | |
| Asian | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 152 | 164 | 150 | 468 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 42 % | 71 | 38 % | 62 | 39 % | 59 | 41 % | 192 | |
| Hispanic-Latino | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 195 | 174 | 117 | 495 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 26 % | 50 | 28 % | 49 | 19 % | 22 | 24 % | 121 | |
| White | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 162 | 146 | 169 | 483 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 68 % | 110 | 69 % | 100 | 64 % | 108 | 66 % | 318 | |
LANGUAGE ARTS
| Socio- economically Disadvantaged | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 311 | 285 | 202 | 809 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 25 % | 78 | 22 % | 63 | 18 % | 36 | 22 % | 177 | |
| English Language Learners | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 137 | 122 | 100 | 358 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 7 % | 10 | 5 % | 6 | 2 % | 2 | 5 % | 18 | |
|
Students
with Disabilities |
Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 46 | 39 | 28 | 120 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 0 % | 0 | 3 % | 1 | 0 % | 0 | 0 % | 1 | |
MATHEMATICS
| Socio-
economically Disadvantaged |
Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 231 | 161 | 73 | 465 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 4 % | 9 | 4 % | 6 | 4 % | 3 | |||
| English Language Learners | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 120 | 80 | 39 | 239 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 3 % | 4 | 6 % | 5 | 3 % | 1 | |||
|
Students
with Disabilities |
Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 15 | 12 | 12 | 39 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 0 % | 0 | 8 % | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
California Standards Test 2004
MATHEMATICS
Percent and Number of
Students (#) at Each Performance Level
Comparison of All Students to Subgroups
| All Students | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| enrolled | 655 | 585 | 529 | 1,726 | |||||
| Number Tested | 399 | 246 | 127 | 772 | |||||
| Advanced | 0 % | 0 | 0 % | 0 | 0 % | 0 | |||
| Proficient | 4 % | 16 | 4 % | 10 | 5 % | 6 | |||
| Basic | 20 % | 79 | 20 % | 49 | 27 % | 34 | |||
| Below Basic | 58 % | 231 | 55 % | 135 | 44 % | 56 | |||
| Far Below Basic | 18 % | 72 | 21 % | 52 | 24 % | 30 | |||
| African American | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 66 | 40 | 21 | 127 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 2 % | 1 | 3 % | 1 | 10 % | 2 | |||
| Asian | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 82 | 50 | 23 | 155 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 7 % | 6 | 8 % | 40 | 9 % | 2 | |||
| Hispanic Latino | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 155 | 102 | 49 | 306 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 1 % | 2 | 4 % | 4 | 2 % | 1 | |||
| White | Proficiency Level | 9th | 10th | 11th | total | ||||
| Number Tested | 81 | 47 | 26 | 154 | |||||
| Proficient & Above | 10 % | 8 | 4 % | 2 | 4 % | 1 | |||
| C. K. McClatchy High 2003-2004 School Year Suspensions |
| Count of Students by Ethnicity and by Grade |
| For the month of June |
| Ethnicity | Number of Students by Grade | Gender | Total Number of Student Susp | Total Percent of Students Suspended | Total Population | Total Percent of Population | Total Number of Incidents | Total Percent of Incidents | Total Number of Instructional Days Missed | Total Percent of Instructional Days Missed | Average Number of Incidents Per Student | Range of Number of Incidents by Student | Number of Students with 4 or more Incidents | |||||
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Female | Male | Minimum | Maximum | |||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaskan Native | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 37 | 1.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 11.1 | 632 | 28.8 | 1 | 11.1 | 3 | 9.1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| African American | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 44.4 | 271 | 12.3 | 4 | 44.4 | 13 | 39.4 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 44.4 | 634 | 28.9 | 4 | 44.4 | 17 | 51.5 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| White | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 623 | 28.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| June Totals* | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 100.0 | 2,197 | 100.0 | 9 | 100.0 | 33 | 100.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| September - June Cumulative Total | ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity | Number of Students by Grade | Gender | Total Number of Students Susp | Total Percent of Students Suspended | Total Population | Total Percent of Population | Total Number of Incidents | Total Percent of Incidents | Total Number of Instructional Days Missed | Total Percent of Instructional Days Missed | Average Number of Incidents Per Student | Range of Number of Incidents by Student | Number of Students with 4 or more Incidents | |||||
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Female | Male | Minimum | Maximum | |||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaskan Native | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 3.6 | 37 | 1.7 | 18 | 3.8 | 62 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 16 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 32 | 42 | 13.6 | 632 | 28.8 | 56 | 11.9 | 176 | 12.5 | 1.3 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| African American | 41 | 15 | 18 | 9 | 34 | 49 | 83 | 26.9 | 271 | 12.3 | 152 | 32.3 | 415 | 29.5 | 1.8 | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 55 | 30 | 21 | 18 | 37 | 87 | 124 | 40.3 | 634 | 28.9 | 192 | 40.8 | 589 | 41.8 | 1.5 | 1 | 6 | 5 |
| White | 16 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 36 | 48 | 15.6 | 623 | 28.4 | 53 | 11.3 | 166 | 11.8 | 1.1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Total (Cumulative)* | 133 | 71 | 60 | 44 | 96 | 212 | 308 | 100.0 | 2,197 | 100.0 | 471 | 100.0 | 1,408 | 100.0 | 1.5 | 1 | 8 | 15 |
| ATTENDANCE 03-04 |
|||||||||||||||
| 9th grade | 10th grade | 11th grade | 12th grade | M | F | ALL | |||||||||
| All Students | 644 | 575 | 531 | 470 | 2220 | ||||||||||
| 1st LETTER | 246 11% | ||||||||||||||
| 2nd LETTER | 193 9% | ||||||||||||||
| 3rd LETTER | 561 25% | ||||||||||||||
| ALL | 1000 45% | ||||||||||||||
| African Amer. | 92 | 68 | 52 | 56 | 117 | 151 | 268 | ||||||||
| 1st LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 2nd LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 3rd LETTER | 34 37% | 28 41% | 22 42% | 30 54% | 114 20% | ||||||||||
| ALL | |||||||||||||||
| Hisp. or Latino | 206 | 172 | 128 | 122 | 316 | 312 | 628 | ||||||||
| 1st LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 2nd LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 3rd LETTER | 77 37% | 64 27% | 43 34% | 48 39% | 232 41% | ||||||||||
| ALL | |||||||||||||||
| White Non-Hisp | |||||||||||||||
| 1st LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 2nd LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 3rd LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| ALL | |||||||||||||||
| Socioeconomic- Disadvantaged | |||||||||||||||
| ATTENDANCE 04-05 (to date) |
|||||||||||||||
| 9th grade | 10th grade | 11th grade | 12th grade | M | F | ALL | |||||||||
| All Students | 601 | 592 | 560 | 504 | 2257 | ||||||||||
| 1st LETTER | 222 | ||||||||||||||
| 2nd LETTER | 184 | ||||||||||||||
| 3rd LETTER | 559 24% | ||||||||||||||
| ALL | |||||||||||||||
| African Amer. | 69 | 70 | 56 | 51 | 113 | 132 | 246 | ||||||||
| 1st LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 2nd LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 3rd LETTER | 28 41% | 26 37% | 26 46.4% | 23 45% | 37 | 66 | 103 18.4% | ||||||||
| ALL | |||||||||||||||
| Hisp. or Latino | 181 | 185 | 159 | 105 | 326 | 304 | 630 | ||||||||
| 1st LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 2nd LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 3rd LETTER | 61 33.7% | 69 37% | 55 34.6% | 39 37% | 224 40% | ||||||||||
| ALL | |||||||||||||||
| White- non Hisp | |||||||||||||||
| 1st LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 2nd LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| 3rd LETTER | |||||||||||||||
| ALL | |||||||||||||||
| 9th grade | 10th grade | 11th grade | 12th grade | M | F | ALL | |||||||||
| Socioeconomic- Disadvantaged | |||||||||||||||
Sacramento City
Unified School District
School Plan 2005
School-Based Coordinated Program
School: C. K. McClatchy High School
The following state categorical funding source(s) will be a part of the School-Based Coordinated Program (SCCP) at the school:
The overall purpose of our school’s participation in the School-Based Coordinated Program (SBCP) will be the utilization of the Professional Development Days, as allowed in the School-Based Coordination Act, for in-service training.
Programs included in the School Plan:
This School Plan has been reviewed by
the school staff and the School Site Council (SSC). It is approved to be
submitted to the SCUSD Board of Education for approval and implementation in the
2004-2005 school year.
| 5/10/05 | John Sugar | |||
| SSC Chairperson’s Signature | Date | SSC Chairperson’s Name Typed | ||
| ELAC Chairperson’s Signature | Date | ELAC Chairperson’s Name Typed | ||
| 5/10/05 | Dr. Daisy Lee | |||
| Principal’s Signature | Date | Principal’s Name Typed |
Sacramento City
Unified School District
School Plan 2005
Recommendations and Assurances
The School Site Council recommends this school plan and its related expenditures to the district governing board for approval, and assures the board of the following:
o School Advisory Committee for State Compensatory Education Programs
o English Learner Advisory Committee
o Community Advisory Committee for Special Education Programs
o Gifted and Talented Education Program Advisory Committee
o Other (list) _______________________________________________
Attested:
| Dr. Daisy Lee | May 10, 2005 | |||||||||||||
| Typed Name of School Principal | Signature of School Principal | Date | ||||||||||||
| John Sugar | May 10, 2005 | |||||||||||||
| Typed Name of SSC Chairperson | Signature of SSC Chairperson | Date | ||||||||||||
| 2004-2005 Allocation of Resources | ||||||||||||||
|
Resource
Allocations |
SIP: | *NCLB: $ 490,842 | EIA-LEP: $ 188,338 | SCE: $ | ELAP: | |||||||||
| SAIT: | HPSG: | CSR: $ | II-USP: | Other: $189,114 | ||||||||||
| *Note: 1% of NCLB Title I funds must be allocated to Parent Engagement | ||||||||||||||
| Focus Area | Expenditure | Resource | Amount | Justification | Plan Page # | |||||||||
|
ELA
Math School Climate |
.1 Psychologist | NCLB | $11,032 | Psychologist will observe in classrooms and support teachers in strategizing to better meet the needs of students who have difficulty staying engaged in learning. | Page 15 | |||||||||
| Professional Development |
Carnegie
NCLB ELA Bil SLC Gen’l fund |
$25,000 | Teachers will learn how to write and deliver structured lessons, standards-based instruction, differentiated instruction, classroom management techniques. | Page 6 | ||||||||||
| Office Technician | NCLB | $54,396 | To assist in scheduling students into the right classes and provide technical support to counselors | Page 7 | ||||||||||
| Bookroom Clerk | NCLB | $49,085 | To organize the book room especially when new books are purchased | Page 7 | ||||||||||
| 1.4 Counselor positions | NCLB
ELA Bilingual |
$103,888 | Increase counselors for academic counseling | Page 7 | ||||||||||
| 3.2 Teachers | NCLB
ELA Bilingual |
$177,580 | Additional teachers needed to teach support classes | Page 7 | ||||||||||
| 0.6 Resource teachers | ELA Bilingual | $37,082 | Resource teacher will support ELL in testing, programming, academic advising, etc. | Page 7 | ||||||||||
| 0.2 Computer Technician | NCLB | $13,143 | Provide technical support to students, staff, and teachers | Page 14 | ||||||||||
| Parent meeting/communication |
Carnegie
NCLB ELA Bilingual |
$15,400 | Provides funds for duplication of newsletter, postage, and food for parent meetings | Page 6 | ||||||||||
| Communication |
Carnegie
NCLB ELA Bilingual |
$2,000 | Pay for telephone cost and duplicating cost of letters to send home | Page 6 | ||||||||||
| Supplementary instructional materials and supplies |
Carnegie
NCLB ELA Bilingual Gen’l fund |
$60,000 | Provide sufficient funding so teachers can have instructional supplies to deliver their lessons and purchase “Standards Plus” binders. | Page 7 | ||||||||||
| School Climate- Discipline | Staff Development |
Carnegie
Fed SLC Grant |
$1,280 | Sixteen teachers, four from each SLC, will receive ½ day training on student study team techniques to facilitate implementation of student review teams within their SLC | Page 28 | |||||||||
| School Climate- Discipline | SLC Teacher release time | Fed SLC Grant | $20,480 | Four teachers from each SLC will be provided with 1 day release time each month to perform student review team functions and administrative referrals | Page 28 | |||||||||
| School Climate- Attendance | Part –time Community Liaison Worker | NCLB | $14,756 | Hire bilingual personnel to make attendance calls home to promote improved attendance | Page 26 | |||||||||
| School Climate- Attendance | Part time student outreach worker | NCLB | $10,878 | Hire personnel to monitor SART/SARB as interventions to improve attendance | Page 26 | |||||||||
| School Climate- Attendance | In-service to teachers in working with parents | NCLB, SLC Carnegie | $4,000 | Teachers will learn how to conduct meetings work with parents of various ethnic backgrounds | Page 26 | |||||||||
| School Climate- Attendance | Mailing, postage, cost for parent contact | SL, ELA,NCLB, Carnegie | $3,000 | Keeping parents informed throughout the year | Page 26 | |||||||||
| School Climate- Family Support | Full –time High School Coordinator | NCLB
Carnegie
SLC Grant |
$92,000 | To provide for on-going coordination and support | Page 7 | |||||||||
| School Climate- Family Support | Full-time School Nurse | NCLB | $83,067 | To provide on-going health and family support | Page 22 | |||||||||
| School Climate- Family Support | Career/Health Fair Supplies | NCLB | $2,000 | To provide support and supplies for student academic activities | Page 22 | |||||||||
| School Climate- Family Support |
Parent Meetings-
1. Refreshments |
NCLB
Carnegie Grant Fed. SLC Grant |
$1,000 | Evidence suggests a strong correlation between parent involvement and student success. There is also evidence parents participate in interest specific groups. Each SLC will host parent meetings, communicate through newsletters and the web page (workshops on parenting teens will also be made available) | Page 19 | |||||||||
| 2. Postage, duplication, newsletters, invitations, etc. | NCLB
Carnegie Grant Fed. SLC Grant |
$20,000 | Page 19 | |||||||||||
| 3. Parent workshops, registration, facilitators materials | NCLB
Carnegie Grant Fed. SLC Grant |
$500 | Page 19 | |||||||||||
| School Climate- Student Engagement | Youth Congress Advisor |
Carnegie Grant
Fed. SLC Grant |
$1,700 | Page18 | ||||||||||
| SPIRIT Program- transportation, food/meals | NCLB
Carnegie Grant |
$5,000 | Page 18 | |||||||||||
| Meeting Supplies | NCLB
Carnegie Grant Fed. SLC Grant |
$200 | Page 18 | |||||||||||
| SLC Student Advisory- meetings, meals | Carnegie Grant | $1,000 | Page 18 | |||||||||||
| SLC Summer Bridge- Staffing, meals | Fed. SLC Grant Carnegie Grant | $7,000 | Page 17 | |||||||||||
| Teacher in-service on interventions | $1,000 | Page 17 | ||||||||||||
| School Climate- Learning Environment | Campus Monitor | General Fund | $45,000 per monitor x 5.5 positions | District should increase allocation for campus security personnel to improve safety climate | Page 28 | |||||||||
| ELA | Library Materials in a variety of formats | District Funds K-12 Library Acts Funds/6296 Title V Carnegie Grt SLC Grant Title I | Library media teacher will purchase library materials for school library, manage library circulation and provide motivation and instruction for student reading and research and increase resources for underachieving students | Page 8 | ||||||||||
| SIRS | $2,400 | School library is far below recommended book to student, recommended periodical collection amount, and online database amount: materials will be purchased to provide support for the core instruction and learning environment | Page 8 | |||||||||||
| CQ Researcher | $1,000 | Page 8 | ||||||||||||
| Periodicals | $2,700 | Page 8 | ||||||||||||
| Library Books | $20,000 | Page 8 | ||||||||||||
| Info Trac | $2,200 | Page 8 | ||||||||||||
| Facts.com | $2,000 | Page 8 | ||||||||||||
| NewsBank | $4,800 | Page 8 | ||||||||||||
| World Book Online | $1,000 | Page 8 | ||||||||||||
| Expansion of TRC | District adopted Tech Plan 2003 –07 Amount to be determined per modernization plan information | Page 8 | ||||||||||||
| School Climate- Intervention | Full-time High School Coordinator | NCLB
Healthy Start |
$107,672 | To provide for on-going coordination and support | Page 24 | |||||||||
| 2003 CST Data for CKMcClatchy High School | ||||||
| All Students by Grade | 9th | 10th | 11th | Total Student Population | ||
| Reading | 58.8% | 57.4% | 60.2% | 58.7% | ||
| Language | 56.9% | 58.9% | 60.9% | 58.8% | ||
| Mathematics | 49.3% | 60.8% | 58.2% | 55.8% | ||
| Science | 46.8% | 51.8% | 58.7% | 52.0% | ||
| Spelling | NT | NT | NT | NT | ||
| All Students by Ethnicity | Af Amer | Asian | Hispanic | White | ||
| Reading | 42.0% | 61.1% | 41.3% | 80.9% | ||
| Language | 42.9% | 61.8% | 42.1% | 79.7% | ||
| Mathematics | 27.1% | 65.7% | 37.9% | 77.1% | ||
| Science | 29.1% | 52.0% | 35.3% | 79.2% | ||
| Spelling | NT | NT | NT | NT | ||
| All Students by Language Fluency | English Only | English Learner | Reclassified | |||
| Reading | 67.7% | 17.6% | 80.3% | |||
| Language | 66.9% | 21.3% | 79.4% | |||
| Mathematics | 60.8% | 25.2% | 78.3% | |||
| Science | 60.6% | 12.9% | 71.0% | |||
| Spelling | NT | NT | NT | |||
| All Students by Program | Soc-Eco Disadvantaged | Not Soc-Eco Disadvantaged | Special Ed | GATE | ||
| Reading | 38.2% | 78.8% | 6.3% | 100.9% | ||
| Language | 40.3% | 76.9% | 6.3% | 100.9% | ||
| Mathematics | 38.5% | 72.8% | 4.5% | 96.6% | ||
| Science | 32.2% | 71.2% | 7.3% | 95.7% | ||
| Spelling | NT | NT | NT | NT | ||
| NT = No students tested in particular group or subject not tested at grade level | ||||||
| * = Less than 11 students tested | ||||||
| Legend | Group percentage is at or above the total student population | |||||
| Group percentage is below the total student population | ||||||
Sacramento City
Unified School District
School Site Council Roster
Governance and Administration
School: C. K. McClatchy High School
The school site council is the representative body responsible for development of the school plan and related expenditures at schools operating School Improvement Programs, School Improvement and Pupil Achievement and Block Grant Programs, and School-Based Coordinated Programs. The current make-up of the council is as follows:
| Name of Members | Principal | Classroom Teacher | Other School Staff | Parent or Community Member | Secondary Student |
| Cynthia Clark | X | ||||
| Victoria Star | X | ||||
| Ellen Wong | X | ||||
| Bruce Hankin | X | ||||
| Ken Vang | X | ||||
| Ros Fallon | X | ||||
| Lisa Giullen | X | ||||
| John Sugar | X | ||||
| Cynthia Shallit | X | ||||
| Rosa Nguyen | X | ||||
| Alison Saelee | X | ||||
| Tong Chang | X | ||||
| Total number in
each
representative group |
1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |